Jump to content
Mopar1973Man.Com LLC
  • Welcome To Mopar1973Man.Com LLC

    We are a privately owned support forum for the Dodge Ram Cummins Diesels. All information is free to read for everyone. To interact or ask questions you must have a subscription plan to enable all other features beyond reading. Please go over to the Subscription Page and pick out a plan that fits you best. At any time you wish to cancel the subscription please go back over to the Subscription Page and hit the Cancel button and your subscription will be stopped. All subscriptions are auto-renewing. 

6 Speed manual transmission ~ NV5600 ~ General Questions


Recommended Posts

wow long arse thread about trans oil LOL

 

I run amsoil synchromesh MTF in my NV5600

 

No idea what the previous owner ran but that previous trans went boom and got replaced with a later model NV5600 with the larger input shaft. my truck originally came with the standard output engine and small input shaft NV5600 (99.5-00.5 6-speeds were SO motors and small input shaft NV5600s) had my clutch center hubs swapped by south bend to fit the larger shaft after my trans went boom. Been nothing but synchromesh from amsoil ever since in there.

 

I run 9qts of oil in it. The shop that I bought the rebuilt NV5600 from machines a larger reservoir for oil into the transmission to increase the capacity of the oil and focus it where it's needed most. I also added PTO coolers https://www.genosgarage.com/product/transcool-3/transmission-coolers that add another quart capacity and overfilled as well. I fill my trans from the shifter tower by removing the shifter and filling it until that shaft and gears are at least ½ way submerged.

 

Also monitor temp via the adrenaline. 

 

As for clutch: my stock clutch didn't last long when I first put my adrenaline on. So I upgraded to a south bend 3600DD clutch and threw in over 200HP more into the mix.That clutch is still holding up for now. However I don't expect it to last as long as a stoock clutch on a stock truck, but it definitely holds pretty tight! Tight enough to rip all the teeth off of gears before slipping. 

 

clutch wear is really up to how you drive the truck and the conditions the truck is in...someone that lives out in the middle of nowhere likely doesn't have to deal with stop n go traffic...stop and go will wear out a clutch significantly faster than someone who livesway out in the country and doesn't have to deal with bumper to bumper traffic on a busy 6 lane(per direction) interstate that's crawling at 0-5MPH...

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

To follow up on this topic, the 5 gallon pail of Red Line MTL 75W80 part # 50206 did not show up in time of the appointment at the garage so I went with the 50% Amsoil MTF/50% SAE 50 Synthetic transmission oil. With the TDS pto covers it takes a little over 2 more quarts of oil to fill the transmission up to the now relocated and raised oil fill hole.

 

My observations were as soon as I got in the truck, I tried shift through some gears with the engine off and it was SOOOOOOOO much easier.  It was like shifting butter.  What surprised me was that the transmission does shift a bit stiff between gears and I just have to take it slow between gears until the oil in the transmission warms up and then it is back to shifting like butter again.  Being that it shifted so much easier with the engine off, I expected it to shift the same engine running but before the whole thing started, I was expecting in the back of my mind that the significantly higher viscosity oil would cause stiff shifts until the oil warmed up.  

 

Overall, I am very satisfied with it.  

 

Now...........I have to decide what to put in the wife's NV5600.  Her truck has about double the miles mine has and the 2nd to 3rd gear shift MUST be done with a momentary hesitation in neutral or the synchronizers bark at you and reject the shift.  I was originally considering the Redline oil for both trucks but I am concerned that the higher viscosity oil may cause a problem synchronizer and shift to become even more of a problem.  On the other hand the higher viscosity oil may help to dampen out the lagging synchronizer and make the shift a bit better. :shrug:  Any thoughts on this?  :smart:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Staff

Did your trans not shift like butter with the engine off before? Mine always has. 

 

The thicker fluid might grab at the worn syncro's better, and like you said it might not. No way to tell without trying. 

 

SAE50 is thicker than both the Amsoil MTL and cold/cool Redline 75w-90, so there isn't much surprise it needs to warm up. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/16/2018 at 6:07 PM, LiveOak said:

To follow up on this topic, the 5 gallon pail of Red Line MTL 75W80 part # 50206 did not show up in time of the appointment at the garage so I went with the 50% Amsoil MTF/50% SAE 50 Synthetic transmission oil. With the TDS pto covers it takes a little over 2 more quarts of oil to fill the transmission up to the now relocated and raised oil fill hole.

 

My observations were as soon as I got in the truck, I tried shift through some gears with the engine off and it was SOOOOOOOO much easier.  It was like shifting butter.  What surprised me was that the transmission does shift a bit stiff between gears and I just have to take it slow between gears until the oil in the transmission warms up and then it is back to shifting like butter again.  Being that it shifted so much easier with the engine off, I expected it to shift the same engine running but before the whole thing started, I was expecting in the back of my mind that the significantly higher viscosity oil would cause stiff shifts until the oil warmed up.  

 

Overall, I am very satisfied with it.  

 

Now...........I have to decide what to put in the wife's NV5600.  Her truck has about double the miles mine has and the 2nd to 3rd gear shift MUST be done with a momentary hesitation in neutral or the synchronizers bark at you and reject the shift.  I was originally considering the Redline oil for both trucks but I am concerned that the higher viscosity oil may cause a problem synchronizer and shift to become even more of a problem.  On the other hand the higher viscosity oil may help to dampen out the lagging synchronizer and make the shift a bit better. :shrug:  Any thoughts on this?  :smart:

 

 

You said your wifes is a NV5600 but what trans is yours?

 

nv5600s call for synchromesh manual transmission fluid which has the viscosity of 5w30 motor oil.

 

I can definitely see gear oil building more heat due to higher fluid resistance against the gears. resistance generates heat.

Good synchromesh and fill it up half way up the rotating assembly and call it good. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, jigabop said:

 

 

You said your wifes is a NV5600 but what trans is yours?

 

nv5600s call for synchromesh manual transmission fluid which has the viscosity of 5w30 motor oil.

 

I can definitely see gear oil building more heat due to higher fluid resistance against the gears. resistance generates heat.

Good synchromesh and fill it up half way up the rotating assembly and call it good. 

Both her's and my truck have the NV5600.  

 

No.  These transmissions call for lubricant that meets Chrysler MS9224 specifications. All of the above fluids I listed with the exception of the SAE 50 synthetic transmission oil meet this specification as does synchromesh.  I tried synchromesh and it worked OK but not nearly as good as it does now.  I had pto covers that have a raised lubricant level port which allows for about 2.5 extra pints.   

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Owner

 

1 hour ago, jigabop said:

I can definitely see gear oil building more heat due to higher fluid resistance against the gears. resistance generates heat.

 

Hmmm... Strange I've got trouble with 50 WT lube to get above 100°F on the transmission temp. It like the viscosity of 90 WT gear lube. I've got to be above 50°F outside temp to even break above 100°F trans temp. Without FASS coolers... I've finally made 100k miles on 50 WT oil still going strong no issues to report. Now heading for 200k milestone!

 

DSCF4514.JPG

Edited by Mopar1973Man
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mopar1973Man said:

 

 

Hmmm... Strange I've got trouble with 50 WT lube to get above 100°F on the transmission temp. It like the viscosity of 90 WT gear lube. I've got to be above 50°F outside temp to even break above 100°F trans temp. Without FASS coolers... I've finally made 100k miles on 50 WT oil still going strong no issues to report. Now heading for 200k milestone!

 

DSCF4514.JPG

 

It looks like your oil temp sender is too high, you might be getting a false reading. And your truck is just too dang clean!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Owner
53 minutes ago, NIsaacs said:

 

It looks like your oil temp sender is too high, you might be getting a false reading. And your truck is just too dang clean!

 

Slightly overfilled about a pint. Just checked the fluid today and its still over the top of the sensor. Just got to lightly tip the sensor sample the oil for color and screw the sensor back in and plugin again. Putting the sensor at the bottom will get a false cooler reading since heat rises to the top. This is quote the "hot side" of the transmission which most have heat shields, exhaust blankets and such to keep the transmission cooler. Again mine is cooler from the start without any fast coolers, blankets or heat shields. Now figure that out... All I'm running is that GL-4 50 WT Mobil Transmission Fluid... 

 

@AH64ID had the same comment to and we already dealt with that problem. 

 

57 minutes ago, NIsaacs said:

And your truck is just too dang clean!

 

Like today I crawled the entire truck checking lubes and inspecting brakes and everything the last thing I want is get total covered in oil and dirt. I keep after my leaks and keep the dirt and mud rinsed off. Winter time salt does it task when you leave a ton a mud under the truck. This why I been able to hold the rusting at bay so long!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Staff
1 hour ago, Mopar1973Man said:

 

Slightly overfilled about a pint. Just checked the fluid today and its still over the top of the sensor. Just got to lightly tip the sensor sample the oil for color and screw the sensor back in and plugin again. Putting the sensor at the bottom will get a false cooler reading since heat rises to the top. This is quote the "hot side" of the transmission which most have heat shields, exhaust blankets and such to keep the transmission cooler. Again mine is cooler from the start without any fast coolers, blankets or heat shields. Now figure that out... All I'm running is that GL-4 50 WT Mobil Transmission Fluid... 

 

@AH64ID had the same comment to and we already dealt with that problem. 

 

I still think it’s too high thou. The fluid level will likely drop several inches at speed. 

 

I also think the reducing bushings place the probe too far out into the ambient air, which will also reduce the temp readings. 

 

My oil temperature gauge sticks out of the filter head about the same amount and if it didn't have constant fly around it (in the feed for my bypass) I wouldn't trust it's accuracy. Being that your transmission doesn't have pressurized flow around the probe, and the level is likely below the probe at speed I think the reads are low. 

 

The fluid moves enough that the bottom would give a fluid bath temp, which would likely read higher. 

 

Next time you change the fluid you should relocate it to the PTO cover for a final determination. 

 

 

Edited by AH64ID
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Owner
24 minutes ago, AH64ID said:

The fluid level will likely drop several inches at speed. 

 

Ummm... Seriously doubt that several inches comment. :whistle2: Being that from the bottom of the case drain plug to the bottom fill plug is only 6 inches. I've got 7 inches of oil in the case which is over the top of the sensor. 

 

There is oil over the top of the sensor even if I put the gearbox in 5th gear rough road speeds RPM (~1,800) and transfer case in neutral and check it still got oil over the sensor. I've checked this too. 

Edited by Mopar1973Man
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Staff
1 minute ago, Mopar1973Man said:

 

Ummm... Seriously doubt that several inches comment. :whistle2: Being that from the bottom of the case drain plug to the bottom fill plug is only 6 inches. I've got 7 inches of oil in the case which is over the top of the sensor. 

 

There is oil over the top of the sensor even if I put the gearbox in 5th gear rough road speeds RPM (~1,800) and transfer case in neutral and check it still got oil over the sensor. I've checked this too. 

 

Ever seen how far it drops in the diff? Several inches is probably accurate. 

 

Several inches wouldn't surprise me at all, in fact I'd be very surprised if your probe was in the bath at highway speeds. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Staff
54 minutes ago, dripley said:

I would have to add that even though heat rises I dont think the temp is enough different from top to bottom with the gears stirring the fluid up.

 

I compleatly agree. 

 

The potential issue I see with @Mopar1973Man‘s location is the removal of the probe from direct fluid contact due to its height as well as the reducing bushings.  

 

If the probe were constantly bathed in fluid I bet it would read hotter. 

 

Just the effect of the bushings and airflow will alter the readings. 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want to add something too :hyper:

Even if sensor is not in oil when moving, coming to a stop should then make the temp go up if sensor got submerged in fluid when stopped. I would think :think: unless air inside is same temperature then nothing would change. But then again I seen my temp drop 15- 20 degrees or so in matter of seconds less than a minute on a hot day, lagging it in 6th and then downshifting to 5th keeping same speed. So maybe by the time you come to a stop it would change to much to really see what happens at speed vs load. 

Did anyone understood what I'm trying to say or is it just me following my own thoughts :violin:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Dieselfuture said:

Even if sensor is not in oil when moving, coming to a stop should then make the temp go up if sensor got submerged in fluid when stopped.

 

If the operator shifts the transmission into neutral and takes his foot off of the clutch pedal (as he should) when he brings the truck to a stop, then the transmission input shaft and all the gears and bearings on the counter shaft would still be turning, albeit everything would be turning at a  much slower speed and there would be no load on the gears and bearings.  However, there still would be plenty of splashing going on so I would think that the oil level would be quite a bit  lower than it would be if the engine was shut down. 

 

Since friction from loaded bearings and gears would generate heat, it stands to reason that heat would be conducted to the oil as the oil flows around the bearings and gears.  So it seems to me that you would want that sensor immersed in the oil that is returning and collecting in the lower part of the transmission.

 

I think it would be worth some trial runs with the sensor in different locations.  Just my two cents.

 

52 minutes ago, AH64ID said:

The temp when stopped would be lower anyways as there isn’t heat being generated with the gears, and the fluid isn’t moving to pull heat out of the gears/bearings

 

I agree.  For example,  if you had been pulling a load at highway speeds for awhile and then you decided to stop and get some fuel, by the time you arrived at the service station, the transmission would have cooled considerably because of the greatly reduced load.

 

- John

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Going back to another life as a UH-60 Maintenance Test Pilot, if I recall from my rusty and faltering memory, the chip detector and the temperature sensors were mounted on the bottom of the main transmission.  Perhaps this may have been a function of accessibility and maintenance design but I guess the point I am making is that the oil is being circulated repeatedly throughout the transmission performing its primary lubrication purpose but also its secondary purpose of carrying thermal energy (heat) to via main module pump to the transmission oil cooler would carry and distribute the main transmission thermal load throughout the oil circulation path.  I am sure the indicated temperature would vary depending upon the location on the transmission it is mounted but probably not enough to matter.  

 

In Mike's case with his NV4500, even if the temperature probe was not in the oil bath/sumped oil, so much would be slung by the main gear shaft throughout the transmission case, I would suspect the temperature throughout the transmission would be reasonably consistent and not vary enough to make that much of a difference.

 

Anyhow........this comment should make things clear as mud now! LOL!  :lmao:

  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...