Mopar1973Man

I heard of guys sleeving a cylinder to repair damage... I've seen only one ford gasser ever done...

Ask yourself how many forums do you see advertising BANK's products? :rolleyes LOL

Deer hamburger anyone??? LOL

I'm not impressed with Banks at all... In all the forums on the internet there is so little of him around... (Products etc.) :rolleyes

Yeah... I was using pics from the static web site but the pics are now long gone... But I could send you the links to the PDF files that now replace them... :thumbsup http://mopar.mopar1973man.com/cummins/general/better-mpgs/better-mpgs.htm 128:1 ratio is what I normally run... As for what you added or how much to 100 gallons of fuel... :confused: You got me... :rolleyes

Here you go... http://mopar.mopar1973man.com/cummins/general/2-cycle-oil/2-cycle-oil.htm http://mopar.mopar1973man.com/cummins/general/2-cycle-oil/failure/failure.htm

snag his butt and drag him over... :wow LOL

I'm still scared to punch any holes in my pan to this day... :wow

Like me I buy 4 gallons of Supertech Outboard oil in the spring and fall... $8.00 x 4 = $32 for 6 months of fuel treatment $32 x 2 = $64 for the entire year for 2 cycle oil... Still cheaper for Wally World oil... LOL

Well on the Frantz Filter setup there is a restriction fitting in the input side of the filter to reduce the flow so it doesn't blow out the can seals. As for return if you can tap the return line of the turbos you would be fine... I'm not very happen with the return in the cap either. If I could change that I would but I'm not going to drill holes in my valve cover. But I know there is a nice plug in the crankcase near the pan I could use...

MattyMx is right...PS is much lower on the lubricity measurement compared to Standyne... But If you use very little of the PS say (2-5 Ozs) per full tank of guel you'll be able to rid yourself of it without reducing the HFRR to much. But if you wanted to get rid of quickly get some Opti-lube and use the two products together. That way the Opti-lube builds up a good lubricity and the PS can piggy back with suck it back down to bad...

No not yet for New Meadows, Id... But for larger cities like Boise, ID and such do have emission control testing. :rolleyes Coming to city near you! :confused:

Well I got something right up your alley... There is all the wiring on heated seat for 2001 trucks which should work for you... :thumbsup

That was just point improvement... LOL 636 HFRR - 162 Point Improvement = 474 HFRR (200:1 Ratio - Known Information)636 HFRR - 324 Point Improvement = 312 HFRR (100:1 Ratio - Thoery...)

That's when I take my Edge comp and shove it back into the dash temporarily and set it on 1x1 and run the test... LOL

I admit your right... About the math... I tend to like to keep things simple...But as for taking up a collection it would be rather difficult being my member base is rather small and random. :rolleyesNow if the member base was to improve and there was a show of activity I would say we had a chance at getting this testing done on the fuel and 2 cycle oil. So Keydl are you willing to bring more members in to the group??? :confused:

That's what's so amazing... That a company like PowerService is advertising a product that contain a secret chemical called "SlickDiesel" but in there own FAQs section on there site they point out that PS only meets the 520 HFRR standard. Nothing else said about exceeding the standard just meeting it. Well geez... That's like saying we are just as good as the ULSD but we got Slick diesel... :rolleyes Then there is MMO. A product that has the word "OIL" on the bottle and everyone flocked to it thinking it would lubricant anything and everything. But it so far from the truth again. It doesn't even contain a lubricant in it... :rolleyes The list goes on... Like I made a comment on a site once before that if I took 2 cycle oil and relabeled it as "Mopar1973Man's Diesel Fuel Lubricant" and sold it to the public there won't be a second though about it. Because I'm a company producing a product and that's considered SAFE! :nono :rolleyes This is the point I'm making no one is willing to research anything at all to protect what they got... But these same people are the very same ones that shoot me down at their first chance... :mad

Well just for simple math...200:1 Ratio is 162 Point improvement...100:1 Ratio is ~324 Point Improvement (162 x 2 =324)

Thank you for you great comments guys...

That's scary... :wow

Hey Now... No plumber butt... Just a hard work guy fighting rusted bots and nuts... We even scored them with a hacksaw and broke them off with a hammer... :wow

Well appears you doing rather well with the 2 cycle oil mixture... Still holding good MPG's and with the clutch doing even better now... :D I'm wondering how much 2 cycle oil and you adding (ratio???)

ScanGauge II is completely safe for use in all vehicles and should not void warranties... Simple reason it only a READER... :thumbsup

This is the straw that broke the camels back... I've finally tired of the constant beating down of my 2 cycle oil theory and my hard work. Check out this thread... http://www.cumminsforum.com/forum/alter ... e-oil.html As I said on the thread....

Here you go the dimensions of the ScanGaugeII http://www.scangauge.com/products/sg2photos/index.shtml